BLM considers offering Utah’s Recapture Canyon — rich in American Indian artifacts — for oil and gas leasing
First Published Jul 05 2017 07:00AM
•
Last Updated Jul 05 2017 03:02 pmThe Bureau of Land Management is proposing to lease Racapture Canyon,
east of Blanding, for oil and gas development, along with other
culturally important spots in Utah’s San Juan County.
Environmental review » The feds want to assess
45 parcels that could be offered; critics worry about damage to
archaeological sites.
Recapture Canyon is so rich in fragile Native American prehistory that it is closed to motorized use, yet the Bureau of Land Management
is now proposing to lease the canyon east of Blanding for oil and gas
development, along with other culturally important spots in Utah's San
Juan County.
The land agency has initiated an environmental
assessment of leasing 45 parcels covering 57,074 acres recently
"nominated" by energy companies interested in tapping these areas for
hydrocarbons. Under the Obama administration, the BLM would have
"deferred" a leasing decision on most of these parcels, but President
Donald Trump's strategy of American "energy dominance" requires federal
land managers to ease impediments to drill,
Historic preservationists are concerned that
the proposed leases could usher in drilling near numerous known sites
occupied by Ancestral Puebloans, who left a rich record of their lives
in area canyons and mesas.
"This is the second example [recently] of how
the Trump administration's push for oil and gas development is running
roughshod over Utah's federal public lands," said Steve Bloch, legal
director for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. "First, Utah BLM
announced its intent to sell oil and gas leases in Utah's amazing San
Rafael Swell and right next to Dinosaur National Monument and now this."
Most of land proposed for leasing is east of
the new Bears Ears National Monument. Under the BLM's 2008 resource
management plan, this area is open to oil and gas leasing without many
special stipulations protecting cultural resources. But that doesn't
mean the agency will automatically allow drilling, officials said.
"The BLM is aware there are sensitive resources
here and will be carefully reviewing each parcel, consulting with
tribes and cultural resource experts, and reaching out to the public as
part of our environmental review process and responsibilities under the
National Historic Preservation Act," said Robin Naeve, fluid minerals
chief for the BLM's Utah state office.
The environmental review launched last week will determine whether these nominated parcels are appropriate for leasing.
"As part of public scoping, people are invited
to come forward with knowledge or concerns about these parcels, so they
can be addressed. A robust analysis is key to making well-reasoned
decisions about whether it is appropriate to lease these parcels," BLM
spokeswoman Lisa Bryant added.
The public has until July 27 to file comments that would be used to guide the environmental review.
This year's Canyon Country lease sale could be a replay of the 2015 sale, when the BLM proposed offering numerous parcels in the same archaeologically rich areas only to withdraw 36 of them after a public
outcry. At the time, the agency said the "geographic area is known to
possess [a] considerable degree of unique cultural resources."
Some parcels now proposed for sale cover the
same areas around Montezuma Creek and Alkali Ridge, which feature the
highest concentrations of archaeological sites in the nation. One covers
Montezuma Canyon at the site of Three Kiva Pueblo, an accessible Anasazi ruin the BLM has restored and developed for public enjoyment.
Another proposed lease covers the site of a
"great house," a massive sandstone masonry structure of great importance
to a civilization centered around New Mexico's Chaco Canyon.
Josh Ewing, director of Friends of Cedar Mesa, believes this is the northernmost great house associated with Chacoan culture.
"This one would rival the largest
buildings in San Juan County today," Ewing said. "It would have been the
sort of thing people would have travel to from far away."
Locals are familiar with Recapture Canyon,
long a sore point for ATV enthusiasts who would like to ride there.
Three parcels eyed for leasing span this canyon, which became a
flashpoint in the West's public land conflicts when protesters drove
through three years ago.
San Juan County has unsuccessfully petitioned
the BLM for years to grant a right-of-way along the perennial creek
below Recapture Dam, which courses between scenic sandstone walls where
cliff dwellings are still evident. The agency closed the canyon to
motorized use in 2007 after discovering unauthorized trail construction
had damaged numerous archaeological sites.
Impatient with what locals saw as BLM
dithering, San Juan County Commissioner Phil Lyman organized the illegal
ride to protest federal land management policies that complicate access
and use of public lands, which comprise 92 percent of Utah's largest
county. Lyman eventually was convicted of a misdemeanor and spent 10
days behind bars.
The proposed leases cover southern portions of
the canyon, from Browns Canyon south to Perkins Road, which harbors
Recapture's most vulnerable archaeological sites. The ATV protest ride
passed through the northern portion and exited at Browns Canyon.
According to Bryant, 19 parcels are inside the
stalled San Juan master leasing area, a region proposed for a special
planning district that would ensure energy development doesn't overwhelm
other resources.
Under Obama, the requests for leasing would
have been put off until that plan was complete. Ewing believes it would
be best for both industry and conservation if BLM stuck to that policy.
"Otherwise they will have protests and lawsuits
every time they do something," he said. "You will be more energy
dominant if your energy development system is not tied up in the
courts."
No comments:
Post a Comment